Help to Buy: Let the Property Scramble Begin

This article by Rupert Jones of theguardian on October 5th, 2013 tells us the criticism from experts regarding the second part of the government's help to buy scheme.

A range of government-backed 95% mortgages are set to go on sale next week after ministers fired the starting gun on a new property scramble.

Two partially state-owned banks, Royal Bank of Scotland and the Lloyds Banking Group, will offer the loans initially, and millions of people will potentially be eligible to sign up.

Under the controversial Help to Buy scheme, homebuyers will only need to put down a 5% deposit – and it is open to existing owners as well as first-time buyers. What is more, there are no limits on how much you can earn and it applies to both old and new-build properties costing up to a generous £600,000.

RBS and its NatWest arm seem to think this second part of the Help to Buy scheme, which is being launched three months earlier than planned, has the potential to be the financial equivalent of the Harrods sale. They say customers will be able to visit any of their 2,000 branches or ring up, and add that opening hours will be extended at peak times "to help with customer demand".

Homebuyers were this week awaiting details of the deals – in particular, how attractive the pricing will be – amid speculation that the scheme could push down rates on 95% mortgages from their current levels of between 5% and 6% to perhaps as low as 4.5%, as well as increasing the choice of products available. That could lop almost £100 a month off the typical payments of someone taking out a £160,000 mortgage.

RBS and NatWest say they will offer "a range of competitive 95% mortgages" to first- and next-time buyers. These will initially be available in branches and over the telephone, and later via mortgage brokers. Halifax, part of the Lloyds group, will also be offering deals from launch; these will be available via branches and brokers. Lloyds Bank will participate from January, while other lenders such as Santander and Nationwide have yet to confirm whether they will take part.

While the scheme won't become fully operational until January, people will be able to start applying from next week, and once their mortgage is approved the funds will be available straightaway – they won't have to wait until the new year to complete on their home purchase.

There has been fierce debate about whether the scheme will hand a vital lifeline to homebuyers or simply drive house prices even higher, but what is undeniable is that this is a huge and potentially risky venture for the government. It is partially guaranteeing £130bn of low-deposit mortgages, which ministers have claimed could translate into assistance for well in excess of 500,000 homebuyers over three years.

That is a lot of people potentially being helped but, even so, there are fears demand could massively exceed supply. Santander issued research yesterday claiming 10% of Britons – equivalent to 5.1 million people – believe they are likely to buy a property in the next 12 months. A third of these, 1.7 million, said they planned to use Help to Buy.

In reality, some of these people would be locked out of the scheme because, for example, they are buying a property to rent out, or a second home, both of which are excluded from Help to Buy, or they don't meet the requirements on income and past credit history – but this still suggests that fears of a stampede of applicants may not be misplaced.

Phase two of Help to Buy is about encouraging banks and building societies to offer more mortgages that only require a small deposit (at least 5%) by giving them the opportunity to buy a guarantee on the "top slice" of the home loan – the bit between 80% and 95%. If a borrower gets into financial difficulty and their property is repossessed, the government will cover a chunk of the lender's losses.

Ministers are making available £12bn of guarantees to lenders, but the latter will have to pay a fee for each mortgage underwritten.

The scheme has come in for harsh criticism from some commentators. On Thursday, Howard Archer, chief UK economist at IHS Global Insight, warned: "There is a mounting danger that house prices could really take off over the coming months." He was speaking after figures from Halifax revealed that house prices are rising at their fastest annual pace for more than three years.

• A free Help to Buy show is taking place today (5 October) at the Glow events venue at the Bluewater shopping centre, Kent, between 10am and 4pm. The event is aimed at people in Essex, Kent, Sussex and south London. Go to glowbluewater.co.uk for more.

Article Source: http://www.theguardian.com/money/2013/oct/05/help-to-buy-property-scramble

Lenders in the UK Confident That Stress Tests Will Not Bar Most Mortgage Applicants

According to the research by the Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Association intermediary mortgage lenders in the UK are ensured that new affordability checks resulting from the MMR will not significantly reduce the number of people who successfully apply for a mortgage as shown in this recent article by the Property Wire on September 3rd, 2013.

Research by the Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Association found just 7% of intermediary lenders expect significantly more people will be turned down for a mortgage because of new stress tests, which will examine whether borrowers could afford their repayments in the event of interest rates rising.

IMLA’s Intermediary Lending Outlook shows that almost three quarters of lenders are confident that affordability checks will not impact borrowers in large numbers while the remaining 20% are unsure.

Overall responsibility for affordability checks will officially pass from brokers to lenders when the MMR takes effect in April 2014.  While many of its provisions are already standard practice for lenders, mortgage brokers are less convinced that aspiring borrowers will be unaffected.

Although 34% of brokers do not expect stress tests will significantly reduce the number of successful mortgage applicants, some 44% predict that considerably more consumers will find they are turned down.

However, brokers are significantly more confident about the impact of the MMR than they were at the start of the year. Some 66% are not at all worried in August 2013, compared with 42% in January 2013, and the percentage with significant worries has dropped from 12% to 4%.

In contrast, 67% of lenders are currently worried about the impact of MMR but despite their extra responsibilities under the new rules, no lender has serious concerns.

‘The MMR rules on affordability are built on common sense and are not too far removed from how many lenders already approach the issue. Recent experience has shown how important it is to ensure that mortgage borrowers can reasonably manage their commitments, not just now but in the future,’ said Peter Williams, executive director of the IMLA.

‘We are in unfamiliar territory when it comes to current interest rates, so we have to be pragmatic and anticipate the likelihood of change. Falling numbers of arrears and repossessions in recent years show a responsible approach to mortgage approvals, and lenders are working hard to ensure their existing tests meet the full MMR requirements without unfairly disadvantaging consumers,’ he explained.

‘Although the regulatory buck will rest with lenders from April 2014 there is still a collective responsibility to put affordability at the heart of the industry. This involves brokers working closely with lenders to help finalise the rules of engagement, while also ensuring that customer expectations are managed and applications suitably vetted,’ he added. 

Article Source: http://www.propertywire.com/news/europe/lenders-uk-mortgage-review-201309038187.html